Rob Monti,
Your Favorite MonT-SteR!

 
Subscribe to my feed
Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe with Bloglines
Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Add to My AOL

Subscribe by e-mail:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Blogarama - The Blog Directory

Listed on Blogwise

Christianity Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory

 
Blogs with
MonT-SteR Appeal

Alpha & Omega Min.
Atheism Presupposes Theism
Atheism Sucks!
Christians Behaving Badly Come Reason Ministries
Facing the Challenge
His Hand is On the Door
Let's Try Freedom
ProLifeBlogs
The Thinklings
World Magazine Blog

 

Tuesday, May 24, 2005
by The MonT-SteR
| Links to this post
Dear Senator Warner...
 
I learned today that Senator Warner (R-VA) is among the Republicans in the U.S. Senate who compromised on the Democrats' abuse of the filibuster. Rather than change the procedural rules of the Senate to keep the Democrats from using the filibuster to pervert the "advice and consent" clause of Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, Warner teamed up with the likes of the sour-faced Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV) to see how they could avoid "the nuclear option" -- which is a disingenuous moniker for what would actually restore constitutional procedure and order in the Senate. They all signed a "memo of understanding" that would bring three of the President's judicial nominees to the floor of the Senate for a vote ASAP. That part sounds good, but the odious portion of the compromise would require the President to bring a pool of potential nominees to the Judiciary Committee, which would confer with the President to identify "acceptable, bi-partisan" nominees and weed out extreme ones. Plus, the Democrats reserve the right to filibuster again if the circumstances surrounding a nominee become "extraordinary" enough to warrant it. So this "memo of understanding" not only waters down the powers the Constitution clearly grants to the President to appoint judges, it also clears the path for the Democrats to continue their obstructionism unabated. Tell me, Senator Warner: What is the difference between this "compromise" and just giving the Democrats everything they want? I sure don't see it.

Anyway, I e-mailed Senator Warner, who I've happily supported in the past, to express my disappointment with his actions:
The Honorable John Warner
United States Senate
225 Russell Building
Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Senator Warner:

I wish to express my deep and abiding dismay and disappointment to learn that you are among the Republican senators who have seen fit to compromise with the Democrats on the issue of filibustering President Bush's judicial nominees.

What the press derisively calls "the nuclear option" is actually nothing less than a restoration of constitutional order and procedure in the Senate that the Democrats have blatantly flouted for partisan political gain. It is, therefore, more properly named "the constitutional option," and as such I fail to comprehend your apparent desire to avoid its successful implementation. Your participation in the compromise undermines the work the Republican leadership in the Senate has done to put an end to the Democrats' abuse of the "advice and consent" clause contained in Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution.

As a resident of the Commonwealth of Virginia who is concerned about the Democrats' obvious disdain for the rule of law, I respectfully request that you withdraw your support from the compromise and vote to end the use of the filibuster to keep the President's judicial nominees from receiving an up-or-down vote on the Senate floor.

Sincerely,

Robert R. Monti
6304 Ardsley Square, #201A
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
I'll post any response I get here on tMR.

Blessings,

Rob
aka The MonT-SteR

Labels: ,

Add to Technorati Favorites

Monday, May 23, 2005
"24" Prognostication Redux
 
JANUARY?!?

We have to wait until stinkin' January?!?

Ugh.

You have to understand how my household runs to comprehend my level of consternation at this. The only time the TV is on in the MonT-SteR home (other than to play Baby Einstein DVD's for bAbY MonT-SteR -- who, by the way, just became a one-year-old) is 9 p.m. on Monday nights. "24" is our show. And now we have to wait until stinkin' January to find out what happens next. Grrr...

Well, let the speculation begin.

My earlier predictions were pretty off-base, but not entirely. Palmer did step out on a limb to save Jack Bauer's life, but for different reasons than I anticipated. I should have known that it was too risky for Palmer to give himself up; he was working right under Supreme Weasel President Logan's nose when he ordered the attack on the Chinese embassy. I doubt the Chinese would have bought the notion that Logan knew nothing about it. Moreover, it would have been far more damaging to Sino-U.S. relations for Palmer to do that, and I'm sure he knew it -- no matter how much he wanted to save Jack. In a way, the Security Chief's decision to have Jack whacked gave Palmer the out he needed.

Was this a cheap plot device to enable all us folks out here in television land to have our cake and eat it too? The nuke has been shot out of the sky, Marwan is dead (the creep!), the Chinese are mollified by Jack's "death" in an escape attempt, Palmer saves Jack's life, and Tony and Michelle happily ride off together into the sunset -- never to darken CTU's doorstep again.

Right.

A few ideas about next season:
  • Do you really think the whole Chinese angle is going to go away? They'll feign satisfaction over the details surrounding Jack's supposed demise, but behind the scenes they're going to suspect a U.S. government cover-up and continue their own investigation. A picture of Jack on a surveillance camera or something will turn up, confirming their suspicion. And there will be holes in Chloe's effort to fake Jack's death and autopsy records. Maybe Edgar will slip up again by discovering that Chloe dissembled and then report it to Buchanan in boy scout fashion. Logan's Security Chief will somehow learn of it and start doing his own digging. The secret service agent saw Bauer lying dead and took his pulse, but he may come to suspect something as well -- which would put Tony in the crosshairs, as he was the only other witness to Jack's death. Plus, Bill Buchanan has already stated to both Tony and Audrey Raines that Jack's escape attempt didn't make any sense. One minute, Jack is fully prepared to give himself up, which is consistent with his character. The next he's waylaying his buddy Tony so he can get away? I don't think so. This is going to rankle both Audrey and Buchanan, and perhaps Secretary Heller. When things start looking fishy, they'll become involved. Look for the unraveling of Jack's staged death and disappearance to be a major subplot come stinkin' JANUARY.
  • This may even be the device that draws Jack out of hiding. Palmer, the bald guy with glasses (can't remember his name), Tony, Michelle, and Chloe are all complicit in deceiving both the U.S. government and the Chinese. Suppose somebody fingers Chloe, or Tony? Suppose this happens before Michelle and Tony can get away from CTU? Jack wouldn't hesitate to come out of hiding and surrender to the Chinese to save his friends, to say nothing of doing his patriotic duty.
  • Then there's the matter of the next big threat. Do the U.S. and the Chinese come to the brink of full-scale war over Bauer's disappearance? Or are the details of Jack's disappearance merely a tense undercurrent while CTU works to undo a larger, more urgent problem? The whole issue with Jack seems too infinitessimal to be the cause of a major Sino-U.S. conflagration that will occupy the entire season. Then again, the writers over at Fox do seem to be pretty creative.
  • What about the President who's in a coma? Does he recover? If so, what happens to Logan? I can't see Logan willingly relinquishing all the newfound power and trappings of successfully averting a national disaster (like he had anything to do with it, the weasel).
  • And then there's the question of Jack himself. What is his new life like? Is he happy (probably not)? Does he return to the show at all (it appears so)? Keep in mind that his staged escape and death soiled his record. He attacked a CTU agent and shot at a Secret Service agent in the process. The authorities won't be eager to bring him back into the inner workings of the U.S. government -- unless, of course, the truth becomes known. That would have implications for Logan's administration, to say nothing of the Sino-U.S. relations story line. I think I've read rumblings about next season being the last. If that's the case, it might be time for Jack to go out with honor by coming full circle and surrendering to the Chinese anyway. Who knows?

Phew! Plenty of speculation to go around, and I've done all the speculating I can presently handle. Now all I have to do is wait -- until stinkin' JANUARY!

Blessings,

Rob
aka The MonT-SteR


Labels: ,

Add to Technorati Favorites
"24" Prognostication
 
Well, Habib Marwan just bit it on "24" in a most unsatisfying way. I guess Jack Bauer is going to have to figure it out somehow.

I have a couple of predictions I'm going to make for the remainder of the season finale:

Possibility 1: The other CTU agent involved with the operation at the Chinese consulate gave Jack up. The Chinese now have the evidence they need to implicate the U.S. government in the attack. Jack is going to give himself up as an independent actor, absolving the U.S. government of responsibility. Jack has already expressed to Audrey that he took a desk job in D.C. to get away from all the ugly things he had to do as a CTU agent. In Jack's eyes, going out as the scapegoat will be his opportunity to redeem the horrible acts he's committed.

Possibility 2: David Palmer, who seems to be a great patriot, will offer himself to the Chinese as the independent, secret authorizer of the attack. This also would resolve the U.S. government of responsibility in the operation, in addition to saving Jack Bauer's life.

Jack and Audrey will not be able to patch things up. Their relationship (sadly) is history.

That's all for now. More later....


Blessings,

Rob
aka The MonT-SteR

Labels: ,

Add to Technorati Favorites